Robert
Kirk
talks to Stephen Jones at Tucson II.
SJ: So if you'd like to outline the Basic Package, then we can extend it from there.
Robert Kirk: Right, well, what I'm interested
in is the fact that we and other animals perceive the
world consciously. We see the colours and shapes of
things, we smell, we're sensitive to all aspects of the
world. And there's something it's like for us to see the
world, hear and smell and taste things. As there is, many
of us think, for cats and dogs, horses, cattle, chickens,
and no doubt lots of other animals too. Now, this is a
fact but there's something puzzling about it, because we
and the other animals are physical systems, really.
Complex physical organisms and there are lots of other
physical things around us, tables and chairs, and things,
but we don't think that they perceive the world.
Now we can do a lot of things differently from
inanimate things like tables and chairs. Is it just the
fact that we behave differently from these other things
that makes us conscious? Well I don't think that's quite
right, I think that just behaving in the right way is not
enough. I think that the internal processes inside the
organism make a difference. So they have to be the right
kind of internal processes. And now the question is: What
is it about those internal processes that makes us
subjects of conscious experience? That makes us have
experiences of the world, visual experiences, auditory
experiences and the rest? So what I want to do is give a
framework in terms of which we can understand this, and I
want to do this as simply as possible.
I just want to make it possible for us to
understand how it can be that an object can be a subject.
That something, a structure of neurones and other bits of
matter or perhaps a structure made out of bits of silicon
and wires and so on, can at the same time be something
that it is like something to be. There
are two stages in my approach to this. The first stage is
to set out what I call the basic package which is a set
of capacities that an organism has, either all of, or
none of. Having explained that, which I think is
reasonably straitforward, I then want to go to the second
stage, and the second stage is explaining what else is
needed beyond having the basic package in order to be a
subject of conscious perceptual experience, in order to
be something that is like something to be.
|